From: Scott Kniffin [skniffin@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Sent:
Thursday, June 10, 2004 1:24 PM
To:
mmelton@swales.com
Subject: Re: FW: GLAST Project RFA Response for
your Review
Ok to close this one.
Scott
At 01:06 PM
6/10/2004, you wrote:
Scott,
I sent this updated
RFA response to you about a month ago in response to comments that you made to
our original response. Please review and provide any comments or an
approval to close if the response adequately addresses your
concern.
I'll also be forwarding
another RFA response that was sent to you on May 24th. That RFA was
co-authored with Fred Huegel who approved the response on May
26th.
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark
E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm
N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark E. Melton
[mailto:mmelton@swales.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May
11, 2004 9:20 AM
To: Scott Kniffin
Subject: RE: GLAST
Project RFA Response for your Review
Scott,
In response to your
comments, the GLAST Project has updated our response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA
#5.
Please review this updated
response and let me know if it adequately addresses your
concerns.
If you have any
questions, please contact me.
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark
E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm
N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)
- -----Original Message-----
- From: Scott Kniffin [mailto:skniffin@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov]
- Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:27 AM
- To: mmelton@swales.com
- Subject: Re: GLAST Project RFA Response for your
Review
- Mark,
- What I need to see is this: a document/memo that calculates the
equivalent time/temperature for this method. That is, if the
requirement for the project is burn-in at 125 degrees for 168 hours, the 168
hours (or even 1000 hours) at 80 degrees is equal to how many hours at 125
degrees. (I know there is a formula for this, but I don't know where
to get it.) I do know that the time falls drastically with
temperature. Once this memo is generated then someone in the project
hierarchy needs to sign off that it is acceptable risk. Then the RFA could
be closed.
- Thanks,
- Scott Kniffin
- At 04:35 PM 3/22/2004, you wrote:
- Fred and Scott,
- Attached is a response to an RFA you co-wrote
at the GLAST LAT CDR. Mark Goans, the Code 300 Review chair, has
asked that all Project approved RFA responses be reviewed and approved by
the originators prior to official submittal to him.
- Please review the attached response and let me
know if it satisfactorily closes the RFA you generated. You can
provide your approval or comments back to me and I will distribute them to
the appropriate GLAST Project personnel.
- A response is attached for the following
RFA:
- GLAST LAT CDR # 5
- Thank you for your review and response,
- Mark
- ____________________________________________
- Mark E. Melton
- Systems Engineer
- Swales Aerospace
- Bldg 12, Rm N210A
- GSFC
- (301) 286-7936 (V)
- (301) 286-5717 (F)
-
- Scott Kniffin
- Principal Engineer
- Radiation Effects and Analysis Group
- Code 561.4 NASA GSFC
- 301-286-1185 (W)
- 301-286-4699 (F)
Scott Kniffin
Principal Engineer
Radiation Effects and
Analysis Group
Code 561.4 NASA GSFC
301-286-1185 (W)
301-286-4699 (F)