Scott,
 
I sent this updated RFA response to you about a month ago in response to comments that you made to our original response.  Please review and provide any comments or an approval to close if the response adequately addresses your concern.
 
I'll also be forwarding another RFA response that was sent to you on May 24th.  That RFA was co-authored with Fred Huegel who approved the response on May 26th.
 
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark E. Melton [mailto:mmelton@swales.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 9:20 AM
To: Scott Kniffin
Subject: RE: GLAST Project RFA Response for your Review

Scott,
 
In response to your comments, the GLAST Project has updated our response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA #5.
 
Please review this updated response and let me know if it adequately addresses your concerns.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)

-----Original Message-----

From: Scott Kniffin [mailto:skniffin@pop300.gsfc.nasa.gov]

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 11:27 AM

To: mmelton@swales.com

Subject: Re: GLAST Project RFA Response for your Review

Mark,

What I need to see is this: a document/memo that calculates the equivalent time/temperature for this method.  That is, if the requirement for the project is burn-in at 125 degrees for 168 hours, the 168 hours (or even 1000 hours) at 80 degrees is equal to how many hours at 125 degrees.  (I know there is a formula for this, but I don't know where to get it.)  I do know that the time falls drastically with temperature.  Once this memo is generated then someone in the project hierarchy needs to sign off that it is acceptable risk. Then the RFA could be closed.

Thanks,

Scott Kniffin

 At 04:35 PM 3/22/2004, you wrote:

Fred and Scott,

 

Attached is a response to an RFA you co-wrote at the GLAST LAT CDR.  Mark Goans, the Code 300 Review chair, has asked that all Project approved RFA responses be reviewed and approved by the originators prior to official submittal to him.

 

Please review the attached response and let me know if it satisfactorily closes the RFA you generated.  You can provide your approval or comments back to me and I will distribute them to the appropriate GLAST Project personnel.

 

A response is attached for the following RFA:

 

GLAST LAT CDR # 5

 

Thank you for your review and response,

Mark

____________________________________________

Mark E. Melton

Systems Engineer

Swales Aerospace

Bldg 12, Rm N210A

GSFC

(301) 286-7936 (V)

(301) 286-5717 (F)

 

Scott Kniffin

Principal Engineer

Radiation Effects and Analysis Group

Code 561.4 NASA GSFC

301-286-1185 (W)

301-286-4699 (F)