From: Clifton E. Jackson Jr. []
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: GLAST Project RFA Response for your Review
Hi Mark ... I'm not sure of the rationale for doing box acceptance tests for the conducted susceptibility/emissions only, but if the GLAST Project EMI/EMC lead at GSFC approves of that, I'm OK with the response.  At least some level of flight box acceptance testing is done before going to the higher level of assembly, and if there is a problem it will be caught at the higher level (at the cost of disassembly for repair).

Thanks, CJ

p.s. As a minor note, the spelling should be "susceptibility", I think.

Mark E. Melton wrote:
Attached is a response to one of the RFAs you wrote at the GLAST LAT PDR.  Mark Goans, the Code 300 Review chair, has asked that all Project approved RFA responses be reviewed and approved by the originators prior to official submittal to him.
Please review the attached response and let me know if it satisfactorily closes the RFA you generated.  You can provide your approval or comments back to me and I will distribute them to the appropriate GLAST Project personnel.
A response is attached for the following RFA:
Thank you for your review and response,
Mark E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)