From: Jim Ryan [james.m.ryan@nasa.gov]
Sent: Thursday,
May 20, 2004 9:48 AM
To: mmelton@swales.com
Cc:
mphan@mscmail.gsfc.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: GLAST Project RFA Responses
for your Review
Mark,
I am OK with responses to PDR #45 and CDR
#13. I need more information to be comfortable with closing CDR #12.
I have asked personnel in both Code 542 and at Swales if they have seen the
stress report and concur with the results (latest loads, proper methodology,
proper factors of safety, etc.). It is not clear to me what it means when
it is stated in the response that the "Project" has accepted the report.
For instance, who from the Project reviewed the report and how thorough was the
review?
Jim Ryan
At 04:01 PM 5/19/04 -0400,
you wrote:
Jim,
Attached are 3 responses to RFAs you wrote at the GLAST LAT PDR and LAT
CDR. Mark Goans, the Code 300 Review chair, has asked that all Project
approved RFA responses be reviewed and approved by the originators prior to
official submittal to him.
Please
review the attached responses and let me know if they satisfactorily close the
RFAs you generated. You can provide your approval or comments back to me
and I will distribute them to the appropriate GLAST Project
personnel.
Responses are attached for the following RFAs:
GLAST
LAT PDR # 45
GLAST LAT CDR # 12, 13 (note: a
CD with the full stress report will be forwarded to you along with
#12)
Thank you for your review and
response,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
Systems
Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936
(V)
(301) 286-5717
(F)