From: Jim Ryan []
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: GLAST Project RFA Responses for your Review

I am OK with responses to PDR #45 and CDR #13.  I need more information to be comfortable with closing CDR #12.  I have asked personnel in both Code 542 and at Swales if they have seen the stress report and concur with the results (latest loads, proper methodology, proper factors of safety, etc.).  It is not clear to me what it means when it is stated in the response that the "Project" has accepted the report.  For instance, who from the Project reviewed the report and how thorough was the review? 

Jim Ryan

At 04:01 PM 5/19/04 -0400, you wrote:
Attached are 3 responses to RFAs you wrote at the GLAST LAT PDR and LAT CDR.  Mark Goans, the Code 300 Review chair, has asked that all Project approved RFA responses be reviewed and approved by the originators prior to official submittal to him.
Please review the attached responses and let me know if they satisfactorily close the RFAs you generated.  You can provide your approval or comments back to me and I will distribute them to the appropriate GLAST Project personnel.
Responses are attached for the following RFAs:
GLAST LAT CDR # 12, 13 (note: a CD with the full stress report will be forwarded to you along with #12)
Thank you for your review and response,

Mark E. Melton
Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)