From: Jim Ryan [james.m.ryan@nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 11:24 AM
To: Mark E. Melton
Subject: Re: FW: GLAST X-LAT Peer Review RFA #5 Response
Mark,

I am OK with this response.  I checked with Tom McCarthy and he is also OK with the response.  He thought we had answered this previously (and I thought we had).  Oh well, it doesn't matter now.  The response is acceptable.

Jim




At 11:00 AM 3/18/2005, you wrote:
Jim,
 
I sent the email below to you a few weeks ago, but have not seen a response yet.  This is a response to an RFA that you wrote at the LAT X--LAT Peer Review.
 
Can you please review and provide any comments or questions you have or a recommendation for closure if this adequately addresses your concerns?
 
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
GLAST Instruments Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(240) 988-1057 (M)
(301) 286-5717 (F)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark E. Melton [ mailto:mamelton@pop400.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Jim Ryan (James.M.Ryan@nasa.gov)
Subject: GLAST X-LAT Peer Review RFA #5 Response

Jim,
 
Attached is a response from SLAC to RFA #5 from the LAT X-LAT Peer Review.  Please review the response and let me know if it adequately addresses your concern or if you have any questions or comments.
 
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
GLAST Instruments Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717 (F)