From: Jim Ryan [james.m.ryan@nasa.gov]
Sent: Friday,
March 18, 2005 11:24 AM
To: Mark E. Melton
Subject: Re: FW:
GLAST X-LAT Peer Review RFA #5 Response
Mark,
I am OK with this
response. I checked with Tom McCarthy and he is also OK with the
response. He thought we had answered this previously (and I thought we
had). Oh well, it doesn't matter now. The response is
acceptable.
Jim
At 11:00 AM 3/18/2005, you wrote:
Jim,
I sent
the email below to you a few weeks ago, but have not seen a response
yet. This is a response to an RFA that you wrote at the LAT X--LAT Peer
Review.
Can you
please review and provide any comments or questions you have or a
recommendation for closure if this adequately addresses your
concerns?
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark E. Melton
GLAST
Instruments Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg 12, Rm
N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(240) 988-1057 (M)
(301) 286-5717
(F)
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark E. Melton [
mailto:mamelton@pop400.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Sent: Monday, February
28, 2005 10:30 AM
To: Jim Ryan
(James.M.Ryan@nasa.gov)
Subject: GLAST X-LAT Peer Review RFA #5
Response
Jim,
Attached is a response from SLAC to RFA #5 from the LAT
X-LAT Peer Review. Please review the response and let me know if it
adequately addresses your concern or if you have any questions or
comments.
Thanks,
Mark
____________________________________________
Mark
E. Melton
GLAST Instruments Systems Engineer
Swales Aerospace
Bldg
12, Rm N210A
GSFC
(301) 286-7936 (V)
(301) 286-5717
(F)