Present: Joanne Bogart, Toby Burnett, Xin Chen, Richard Dubois, Marco Frailis, Traudl Hansl-Kozanecka, Michael Kuss, Sean Robinson, Leon Rochester, Tracy Usher, Karl Young
Gleam status: (Toby) Highlights from the detailed report include
Resource issues.
We need to track down the probable memory leak in showering. The evidence so far points to G4Generator, or at the very least to simulation stage rather than Recon.
TkrReconAlg can take up to an hour on particularly ill-favored individual events. (Leon) May be possible to characterize these events so they can be found and filtered out at the start of processing.
Use of relational tables from digis to clusters. This is maybe not necessary for October release. However Leon would like to have it for performance review.
Last minimal tuple items. Still awaiting clarification on meaning of TKR_xeneXSlope and TKR_xeneYSlope.
(Richard) Riccardo's code to prune MC tree blows up on Linux, but not Windows.
(Leon) Need to keep final (just before death) 4-momentum for gammas in MC tree.
Gleam User's Guide: (Richard for Heather) Not much progress in the last week. Please see and comment on loosely-associated (because not Gleam-specific) how-to's.
Performance reviews: Scheduled for Oct. 16, two weeks from today.
News from Údine: (Marco)
FRED is on his way. Riccardo has committed HepRepSvc; still need to do some testing.
Relational tables implementation is stable and usable.
Visual CMT should be ready by the end of the week.
Range-cut study: (Richard) A first look at changing the G4 range cutoff shows we can save significant amounts of processing time this way, but we need to verify the simulation is still sufficiently accurate. His report includes plots and statistics for four different values: 100, 200, 475 and 675 microns.
Action Items
previous
|
minutes index
|
next
|
J. Bogart Last Modified: 04-Aug-2004 15:40:18 -0700